|
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 10:17 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
grstanford
|
#211)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz  Posted: Sat May 05, 2012 9:35 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 4956
|
|
I just clicked that you are talking about Risen II, not the first one. haven't seen Risen II yet, a little disappointed PB hasn't been working on a Gothic instead, to redeem the series.
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jaydip
|
#212)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sat May 05, 2012 9:41 am |
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:32 am
Posts: 1792
Location: India
|
|
Yeah I'm talking about Risen 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
grstanford
|
#213)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 5:54 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 4956
|
If you want a CPU stress test that is actually relevant to gamers and is modern, Skyrim has you covered. Open the Creation Kit, load "Skyrim.esm", then from the "world" menu choose "World LOD...", select "Tamriel" from the list of worlds, tick "Distant Terrain / Water", choose "high priority", then click the "Generate" button. This is what my system looks like while generating the LOD's. Much better than any silly synthetic test.  That's as high in temperature as I've seen my 2600K get. Oh, and I've also attached my grass mod, which gives 100% density to the grass. You can't get more than this short of using the CK to actually place more. Compliments my fog removal mod very well. Attachment:
MoreGrass.zip [1.51 KiB]
Downloaded 5 times
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jaydip
|
#215)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 8:19 am |
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:32 am
Posts: 1792
Location: India
|
|
Thx for sharing this.I wonder when the cpu is stressed @ 94% how much load is generated to GPU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grstanford
|
#216)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 8:44 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 4956
|
jaydip wrote: Thx for sharing this.I wonder when the cpu is stressed @ 94% how much load is generated to GPU? None since you are in the Creation Kit building low detail meshes. Still this is a game engine generating game files. You can't say that about CineBench or OCCT or prime95 or intel burnin test.
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apoppin
|
#217)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 9:16 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 19634
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
Nope, Cinebench isn't generating game files. But it is just as useful in its own right. i'd really like to see your task manager SS with 4GB RAM in your system 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grstanford
|
#218)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 9:24 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 4956
|
|
Maybe one day. Most likely just as I'm about to change out the 8gb of memory I currently have for 32gb of memory. I'm not a constant fiddler like some of you. I build it, ensure it is stable, then use it.
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apoppin
|
#219)
Post subject: Re: Ivy Bridge 3770K Gaming results vs Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 9:33 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 19634
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
NP. i may end up doing it first as i am putting in a request to Kingston next week for more RAM. - i really think that Windows will make do with 4GB and there will be no difference in framerates.  And i have to be a "fiddler" .. so everyone else doesn't need to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
