|
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:19 pm
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
apoppin
|
#31)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC  Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:03 pm |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 20313
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
DAMN ,, your grandfather has been younger longer than me -- although i consider myself barely out of my teens 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jaydip
|
#32)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 12:47 am |
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:32 am
Posts: 1888
Location: India
|
Lol  Enjoy young man 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apoppin
|
#33)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 1:14 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 20313
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
 One down .. two days to go ... .... i'm going home Friday morning ... then the vacation is over 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocre
|
#34)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 2:00 am |
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:22 am
Posts: 2232
|
|
still your pretty lucky to get to be there. I took on a huge responsibility and would love to have the ability to be a part of something that huge. Do you have the feeling that your at a special place and its the beginning of something huge?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apoppin
|
#35)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 2:12 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 20313
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BallaTheFeared
|
#36)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:18 am |
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 5:00 pm
Posts: 2069
Location: Nv Headquarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grstanford
|
#37)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 6:41 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 5166
|
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2246084 Quote: GK110: Actual chip is to feature 15 SMXs (streaming multiprocessors) with 192 CUDA cores each. This gives 2,880 CUDA cores in total. 15 SMX's and not 16. Gee that sounds awfully familiar -- GF100 had 15 SM's enabled. I can absolutely guarantee you that is is no way that there is only 15 SMX's present on a GK110 die.
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keysplayr
|
#38)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 7:21 am |
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:58 am
Posts: 535
Location: New York
|
grstanford wrote: http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2246084 Quote: GK110: Actual chip is to feature 15 SMXs (streaming multiprocessors) with 192 CUDA cores each. This gives 2,880 CUDA cores in total. 15 SMX's and not 16. Gee that sounds awfully familiar -- GF100 had 15 SM's enabled. I can absolutely guarantee you that is is no way that there is only 15 SMX's present on a GK110 die. How can you guarantee it?
_________________
Member of Nvidia Focus Group
NVIDIA Focus Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the Members.
Troll-Free Tech Zone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grstanford
|
#39)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 8:51 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 5166
|
|
Because nobody designs GPU's with odd numbers like that. There is actually 16 SMX's, just like GF100 had 16 SM's, and one SMX is disabled, just like GF100 had a disabled SM.
_________________
This is such total Horse-S**t!
"At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang
Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apoppin
|
#40)
Post subject: Re: Why Kepler is based on GF104 and not GF110 - heading for GTC Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:45 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am
Posts: 20313
Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
i'll be at the GK110 deep dive session today. i'll see what i can find out. My mouse died. Got to head for a recharging station when i head for breakfast in an hour. Day 1 article will be late. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
