|
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 8:45 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
SirPauly
|
#101)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:35 pm |
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:56 pm Posts: 803
|
|
I think the ability to see videos over the Internet is massive but in my thread about 3d stereo, don't think I received a single positive or negative response and find that puzzling. Think the quality is really there and to have windowed 3d stereo is neat and steps forward as 3d stereo is maturing.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
apoppin
|
#102)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:44 pm |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am Posts: 19761 Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
SirPauly wrote: I think the ability to see videos over the Internet is massive but in my thread about 3d stereo, don't think I received a single positive or negative response and find that puzzling. Think the quality is really there and to have windowed 3d stereo is neat and steps forward as 3d stereo is maturing. What thread about stereo 3D?  Quote: Jericho.. hmm! What about Alan Wake? Not on the PC yet? I also played Condemned: Criminal Origins in 3D, perfectly fine (same engine and textures as FEAR, but better game IMO). The original Unreal Tournament worked in 3D under OpenGL but that was with my 7900GTX in SLI when Nvidia used to support OpenGL for S3D. Alan Wake never made it to PC; consolitis claimed what was to be a PC exclusive. Condemned: CI is a pretty good game; i never got into it and now it is on my "to play" list along with Jericho. Nvidia better get it together about their claim of "525 games" validated for 3D Vision. There are a LOT of games that need to be pulled off of that list and a few added. Basically, 3D Vision starts to work well beginning approximately with year 2002. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SirPauly
|
#103)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:50 pm |
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:56 pm Posts: 803
|
|
|
|
 |
|
BoFox
|
#104)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 4:00 pm |
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:46 pm Posts: 3864 Location: Earth
|
SirPauly wrote: I think the ability to see videos over the Internet is massive but in my thread about 3d stereo, don't think I received a single positive or negative response and find that puzzling. Think the quality is really there and to have windowed 3d stereo is neat and steps forward as 3d stereo is maturing. Alright, a positive response: Windowed S3D is a great step forward towards universal integration and compatibility! But also a negative response: Most people don't game in windowed mode. Many games are not even compatible with windowed mode. And your thread has like 3,000 replies! 
_________________ What is this thing right now? Put your arms up on one side of the horizon, put them up into the sky and twist them across, meeting unto the other side of the horizon. That is a sign symbol of life. Face the goodness in life.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SirPauly
|
#105)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 4:06 pm |
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:56 pm Posts: 803
|
|
Where the windowed mode makes sense was for online videos, Google Earth and online gaming to me.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
apoppin
|
#106)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 4:07 pm |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am Posts: 19761 Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
SirPauly wrote: I have a thread at rage3d, about 3d stereo technologies. Stickied on top in this forum room: http://www.rage3d.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=65That is quite a thread you started over there back in '08. i just tried my old PW and universal forum login, and i guess i am also a member of Rage3D. Quote: Welcome, apoppin. You last visited: Apr 10, 2001 at 03:35 AM Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 0. . . . last visited Rage3D in 2001 ....  Did i miss anything while i was away?  At any rate, Nvidia's announcement about YouTube mostly fell on deaf ears here also - there is SO MUCH IGNORANCE and FUD about S3D it isn't funny (actually it IS funny) 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
grstanford
|
#107)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:11 pm |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am Posts: 4987
|
BoFox wrote: [BBvideo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FpSR2xUc-CI[/BBvideo] (Won't work here?) for more, go to http://www.3DVisionLive.comuse the movie camera icon in the full editor
_________________ This is such total Horse-S**t! "At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
apoppin
|
#108)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:36 am |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am Posts: 19761 Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
Has anyone played DiRT 3 yet? It is an even better looking game than DiRT 2 (if that is possible). The benchmark is set on a snow covered Aspen track and i am surprised that there are not a lot more accidents  If you just run it in 3D Vision with all the settings maxed out, you will get weird results and a bit of unease watching it. However, drop AA to 2x and turn Post Processing to Low and tweak a few settings and it looks pretty good in S3D. Better than with DiRT 2 which never quite looked right to me. And it is a different-looking S3D than - for example - Lost Planet: Extreme Condition. With DiRT 3 it is though you are looking at your world inside of a (long) 'aquarium' where all of the action is confined in a 3D area; in LP, the difference is the snow particles seem to come out of the screen and surround the front of your field of vision. Both look good but i much prefer the LP-type implementation and in DiRT 3 the other cars in the background seem to all ride on a 2D plane when they get far away and it will spoil the effect for me. BtW i managed to DL well over 35GB on my two "unmetered days"  It seems that DiRT 3 and Shogun TW both have a lot of patches from Steam. No sooner than i backed up the files than both started to update again (with significant patches of 500+MB each). i am not 100% sure the Steam back-up is working properly with Shogun. Try try again (and it is nearly 30 days till my next "free" D/L day). 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
grstanford
|
#109)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:43 am |
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:19 am Posts: 4987
|
|
Well, it would be a (recent) TW game if it didn't ship with more bugs than a flea riddled dog and need gigabytees worth of patches.
_________________ This is such total Horse-S**t! "At NVIDIA we know that all shredders are green." --Jensen Huang Adam knew he should have bought a PC, but Eve fell for the marketing hype.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
apoppin
|
#110)
Post subject: Re: Input requested on reviews - 3D and 5760x1080 res testing  Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:25 pm |
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:26 am Posts: 19761 Location: 404 - Not Found!
|
My issues were with Steam. i D/L everything to my notebook. Then i back up the files to an external HDD and finally i install from the HDD to my other two HDDs. Well, even though Steam validated my Shogun 2 files and the game actually started on my notebook (everything 'low') and it played the opening cinematic, it couldn't back up more than 12 of 18GB. So i had to copy the installation (data) files from my notebook's HDD to my desktop. With a 50MB d/l it now appears to be working .. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|