They are just now starting to figure it out
So he did the same thing as me, pointing out your skewed results, but he is derailing ? I guess you didn't accuse me, since I am a mod. I welcome people backing up my opinion with facts, since I don't have the time for all that posting (since I am too busy modding) , I just know your results are skewed, and now someone helps me prove it.
And yes, this all smells of marketing, when you start a thread with a logo ? And yes, you don't just compare 3.6 ghz to 4.8 or Nehalem to bulldozer, if there is no fairness, its crap skewed results, and does not belong here.
i can get 4.6GHz on water stable; 4.8GHz would require more than 1.5V and better cooling for OCCT. He is comparing his FX-8150 at 4.8GHz with a HD 6990 to stock Intel CPUs and complaining when anyone questions his results as a "derail"
Pure AMD marketing; and we see posters thank him for his 'efforts' (to obviously drive traffic to his flog on that forum and from at least a dozen other identical threads on other tech forums). And after an ATF mod discussion they allowed this garbage the second time
after the first one got locked with infractions even threatened by Idontcare if posters disrupted the obvious marketing by pointing it out.