http://news.discovery.com/space/why-are-...151007.htm
![[Image: 9b39f14639884849b8ef48beb6aa4fc9.jpg]](http://sen.com/thumbs/1024x576/img/9b39f14639884849b8ef48beb6aa4fc9.jpg)
The above pic is on Saturn's largest moon (Titan), bigger than Mercury and nearly as big as Mars.
Even Mimas's massive crater is being rapidly "erased" (scroll the pictures with captions for more info).
Sexy image:
![[Image: herschel-crater-on-mimas.jpg]](https://empoweryourknowledgeandhappytrivia.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/herschel-crater-on-mimas.jpg)
3-D rendered art
![[Image: IMG000602-br500.jpg]](http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/artwork/IMG000602-br500.jpg)
If "billion(s)-year-old" craters are vanishing within a matter of years, wouldn't the occurrence of cratering impacts have to be at least million times higher for there to still be craters, at that rate?
The above pic is on Saturn's largest moon (Titan), bigger than Mercury and nearly as big as Mars.
Even Mimas's massive crater is being rapidly "erased" (scroll the pictures with captions for more info).
Sexy image:
![[Image: herschel-crater-on-mimas.jpg]](https://empoweryourknowledgeandhappytrivia.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/herschel-crater-on-mimas.jpg)
3-D rendered art
![[Image: IMG000602-br500.jpg]](http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/artwork/IMG000602-br500.jpg)
If "billion(s)-year-old" craters are vanishing within a matter of years, wouldn't the occurrence of cratering impacts have to be at least million times higher for there to still be craters, at that rate?

