12-12-2018, 09:18 PM
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/28...in-servers
Quote:Amazon and Apple responded forcefully to the report, calling on Bloomberg to retract the story. Meanwhile, Super Micro denied its boards were ever compromised and embarked on a quest to offer proof. The company employed an outside firm called Nardello to analyze its servers to find the supposed spy chips. Nardello got a representative sample of current and older model motherboards from both Apple and Amazon servers. Super Micro did not say what number constitutes a “representative sample.”
According to Super Micro’s statement, Nardello found no evidence of malicious hardware on the boards it tested. The company also reviewed design files used to manufacture the boards, finding no unexpected alterations. Super Micro even produced a video explaining its hardware inspection process. The posting stops short of promising a lawsuit, but the company is rumored to be leaning in that direction.
Bloomberg’s initial report cited numerous experts in government and the technology industry who confirmed Bloomberg’s story. However, no one has come forward publicly with evidence—no one seems to have one of these compromised motherboards to analyze. It’s still possible that Bloomberg’s story was technically correct, but there were only a handful of malicious chips implanted, and Nardello’s sample of Super Micro boards didn’t include those. The ball is in Bloomberg’s court if it wants to rebut the latest report.