07-11-2015, 11:29 PM
Those numbers don't even make sense.
Look at the 260, 760, and 960s.
Clearly something is off. Perhaps it's just sloppily done and the results mixed up.
How is the fx faster with those cards but nowhere near that with the cards right next to them?
Look at the 260, 760, and 960s.
Clearly something is off. Perhaps it's just sloppily done and the results mixed up.
How is the fx faster with those cards but nowhere near that with the cards right next to them?