So, you're saying that because they're able to have their own children (if the female is younger than 40-50 years old, and chooses to not use birth control or condoms), marriage should be outlawed for siblings who are in love with each other. I know some middle-aged siblings who live with each other, just to keep each other company - they eat out together at restaurants all the time, go to movies together, and are some of the best buddies on the planet. Their sexual relations are none of your business. Why does it matter if it's a choice or not, like as if you're the judge of their adult rights? Choice or not, it's the heart of the matter that remains (freedom of marriage among consenting adults).
There are some adults with diseases like AIDS or whatever, that can be inherited to their children. Like the exceptionally severe NF2 disease, which has a 50% chance of being passed on. Are you saying that these people shouldn't be allowed to marry the opposite sex?
What about siblings wanting to adopt children (especially if they're infertile themselves)? No?
There are some adults with diseases like AIDS or whatever, that can be inherited to their children. Like the exceptionally severe NF2 disease, which has a 50% chance of being passed on. Are you saying that these people shouldn't be allowed to marry the opposite sex?
What about siblings wanting to adopt children (especially if they're infertile themselves)? No?
Ok with science that the big bang theory requires that fundamental scientific laws do not exist for the first few minutes, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws... 