There are just too many fossils like this one:
![[Image: skull-aspidorhymchus-lge.jpg]](http://dl0.creation.com/articles/p102/c10297/skull-aspidorhymchus-lge.jpg)
![[Image: hutteFieldMuseum_21.jpg]](http://avoision.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/hutteFieldMuseum_21.jpg)
https://www.google.com/search?q=fossils+...4&bih=1551
HUNDREDS MORE IN THE LINK ABOVE.
Look at how MANY fossils of FISH eating FISH, sometimes just halfway chewed up, still not yet fully swallowed.
LOGIC 101 that science forgot:
Fossils are rapidly formed, under extreme pressure scenarios. Usually, most of these fish are squashed (almost always sideways). The same goes for most other mammals, like the frozen mammoth that was vertically compressed while standing up. Fossils do not form over "millions of years". The death and the extreme pressure scenario should have been rapid enough to put digestion to a halt (which would normally disintegrate all the skin and flesh with the stomach acids over 2 days or so).
Sure, they could have been flash-frozen like the mammoths (but for deep water to be flash-frozen this quickly means temperatures have to plunge to -150C - anything warmer and the surface would only freeze while the fish dive deeper). How hard is it for fish to just freeze in the water like that? (The mammoths had TEMPERATE leafy plants still freshly chewed in their teeth and stomachs, not yet digested - meaning -150degrees C would have been the minimum for flash freezing of them all the way through their mammoth bodies instantly, not like in the Star Wars movie, where we can just cut open the stomach and sleep in it for warmth).
Regarding the mammoths - during the ice ages, how could they survive eating arctic plants, if smaller elephants need to eat ALL day long (hundreds of pounds of food each day), which is only available in the thick vegetation areas of Earth (let alone 6 months of arctic snow cover, which would freeze their trunks, along with giant ivory tusks acting like a huge heatsink for the rest of the body)? Mammoth's hair isn't even fur like the types covering arctic animals - it's not the kind that keeps the snow from getting trapped inside the hair fibers and then giving the skin a frostbite. Just because they have some hair doesn't mean they were arctic animals (like sheep with thick wool, living in the hottest areas of Earth). Ordinary elephants today cannot even survive just 2 nights of freezing temperatures - a well known fact across all zoos worldwide.
![[Image: mammoths-berezovka_mammoth.jpg]](http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/webpictures/mammoths-berezovka_mammoth.jpg)
See the mammoth's erect penis that is flattened at the end?
To find out more, as to why:
http://www.creationscience.com/onlineboo...moths.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=fossils+...4&bih=1551
HUNDREDS MORE IN THE LINK ABOVE.
Look at how MANY fossils of FISH eating FISH, sometimes just halfway chewed up, still not yet fully swallowed.
LOGIC 101 that science forgot:
Fossils are rapidly formed, under extreme pressure scenarios. Usually, most of these fish are squashed (almost always sideways). The same goes for most other mammals, like the frozen mammoth that was vertically compressed while standing up. Fossils do not form over "millions of years". The death and the extreme pressure scenario should have been rapid enough to put digestion to a halt (which would normally disintegrate all the skin and flesh with the stomach acids over 2 days or so).
Sure, they could have been flash-frozen like the mammoths (but for deep water to be flash-frozen this quickly means temperatures have to plunge to -150C - anything warmer and the surface would only freeze while the fish dive deeper). How hard is it for fish to just freeze in the water like that? (The mammoths had TEMPERATE leafy plants still freshly chewed in their teeth and stomachs, not yet digested - meaning -150degrees C would have been the minimum for flash freezing of them all the way through their mammoth bodies instantly, not like in the Star Wars movie, where we can just cut open the stomach and sleep in it for warmth).
Regarding the mammoths - during the ice ages, how could they survive eating arctic plants, if smaller elephants need to eat ALL day long (hundreds of pounds of food each day), which is only available in the thick vegetation areas of Earth (let alone 6 months of arctic snow cover, which would freeze their trunks, along with giant ivory tusks acting like a huge heatsink for the rest of the body)? Mammoth's hair isn't even fur like the types covering arctic animals - it's not the kind that keeps the snow from getting trapped inside the hair fibers and then giving the skin a frostbite. Just because they have some hair doesn't mean they were arctic animals (like sheep with thick wool, living in the hottest areas of Earth). Ordinary elephants today cannot even survive just 2 nights of freezing temperatures - a well known fact across all zoos worldwide.
See the mammoth's erect penis that is flattened at the end?
To find out more, as to why:
http://www.creationscience.com/onlineboo...moths.html
Ok with science that the big bang theory requires that fundamental scientific laws do not exist for the first few minutes, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws... 