08-27-2015, 08:43 AM
(08-27-2015, 07:37 AM)happy medium Wrote:(08-27-2015, 05:26 AM)SickBeast Wrote: Eh happy medium long time no see.
Hey man nice to see you also.
AMD could have hit a home run if the Nano was...
1.released last year
2. for ~ 350$
3. slightly faster than a 970
4. with a single 6 pin power connector.
Its too late now.
This all seems reasonable.
I don't get AMD with this launch.
If the Fury X had launched for $550, instant winner.
If the Fury had launched for $450, instant winner.
And if this launches for $300, instant winner.
At those prices AMD would have cleaned house and taken back a ton of much needed market share. Instead they pretended 75% of the world was not buying NVIDIA and that they still had half the discrete market waiting for them.
This was the time to make a big move, sacrifice some margin for a big swing in market share.


