AMD Nano

[BoFox]

Don't you guys know you can't trust review sites.  They are all under nvidia's spell.

AMDs results are all you need, the best in the planet.  They would never lie or mislead......

That is a fact.  

/sarcasm

So AMD isn't sending out review samples?  How cool is that?
There is no way that this thing will run at 1000mhz sustained.  Never ever ever.

Why do you need review samples?!

AMD has shown you clearly that the Nano is much faster than the mini 970 at the settings 99% of gamers use:

4K 0X AA, 0X AF

/sarcasm


I can see why they might do no AA or FXAA at 4K, the PPI of 4K is basically like running AA. (AA is the solution to not enough PPI)

The AF part is ridiculous. (not to mention FXAA has so little performance hit you'd think they'd want that just so their benches have a type of AA)

So honestly, how well does no aa look to you at 4k?  With your ultra dense dpi?

What I have seen is that works very well in some cases but there are still jaggies in other places.  Depending on the game, it can be acceptable.  But it is not 100%.  Aliasing still exist in the 4k I have seen.  The situation is improved but not eliminated.

MUCH improved.  Haven't played much myself - last time was in spring, but I do remember that it literally looked 4 times cleaner/clearer.  It's just like having 4x SSAA with 1080p, but also with 4x the PPI (that downsampled 1080p can only give you).  Like when playing Skyrim, just 2x AA with 4K is pretty much razor sharp to me, if 8x AA is generally considered the max "reasonable" AA level for 1080p.  It's not worth the performance drop to go to 4x AA on 4K, on my aging GTX 780 (which puts the average at around 38fps, I think, rather than around 45).