01-06-2016, 06:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-06-2016, 06:53 PM by RolloTheGreat.)
(01-06-2016, 12:26 AM)SickBeast Wrote:(01-05-2016, 07:15 PM)RolloTheGreat Wrote:You don't think we have insurance here to cover prescriptions and the dentist? Both you and Ben are completely ignorant about Canada, I'm sorry to say. You both have no clue. I guess for people who refuse to look beyond their own backyard I shouldn't expect anything different.(01-05-2016, 10:46 AM)SickBeast Wrote: Actually the talking out your ass part was when you had the audacity and the stupidity to suggest that prescription drugs were cheaper in the USA. Once again I have proved you wrong and once again you refuse to eat crow. Stupid is as stupid does I suppose.
Care to quote that?
Don't believe I said it.
Have said we pay less because our insurance covers it, and that you ride our coat tails because your regs wouldn't be possible without someone paying for the R&D.
Big difference.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
I guess you couldn't quote it.
So we'll move on to:
I didn't say you couldn't get prescription insurance, I said it's not part of your national healthcare plan.
That's not the central issue to my objection to your healthcare though, allow me to ask again the questions not one socialism advocate has ever answered for me:
Three young ladies graduate high school with the same gpa.
One goes to college, borrows $50K, works part time while going to school full time for five years, then works as a chemical engineer and earns $100K a year and a private health care plan.
The other buys a laptop and a webcam, performs sex acts on the internet for people who wire her money, but has no healthcare plan. So she gets subsidized health care that people like the first woman chip in to pay for.
The last thinks both are too difficult, stays living at home occasionally working part time. Gets the subsidized health care from people like the first woman.
How is this fair to the first woman? Why do the people who choose not to have healthcare get to have the government steal it for them?
Who does society need more and who benefits society more?
I'll put it plainly:
If all the people like the second two march into the ocean, leaving the people like the first, society becomes paradise on Earth.
If all the people like the first march into the ocean leaving only people like the second, society becomes catch as catch can 3rd world Hell.
Yet people like you view the first woman as "selfish" because they object to letting others dictate what their level of charitable contribution should be. Disgusting.

