02-08-2016, 08:30 PM
No you're just wrong as usual.
The CNET guy said the most inefficient tv would cost $80/year even calibrated for viewing in a moderately lighted room.
Second, you pay the energy delivery charges (at least in America) whether you use power or not and it's a flat fee. So the consumption is the only charge in America. (and it was $.09/KWh here last I looked- can't help it power is such a rip off there)
If my financial planner told me to do things like save $5/mo on electricity, I'd fire him. My wife and I invest real money, not tip money. Wasn't kidding when I said we should have over $1m when we retire, even if the market severely underperforms.
The CNET guy said the most inefficient tv would cost $80/year even calibrated for viewing in a moderately lighted room.
Second, you pay the energy delivery charges (at least in America) whether you use power or not and it's a flat fee. So the consumption is the only charge in America. (and it was $.09/KWh here last I looked- can't help it power is such a rip off there)
If my financial planner told me to do things like save $5/mo on electricity, I'd fire him. My wife and I invest real money, not tip money. Wasn't kidding when I said we should have over $1m when we retire, even if the market severely underperforms.