04-10-2016, 12:01 PM
(03-30-2016, 11:22 PM)RolloTheGreat Wrote:(03-30-2016, 10:23 PM)gstanford Wrote: Game titles still list Phenom II's in their specs, they don't list bulldozer CPU's...
![]()
And here we se the nature of GStan in a nutshell.
Some games say you need at least a Phenom II for a minimum, so he assumes higher performing current FXs aren't as good.![]()
Watch this Ocre:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8316/amds-...9-review/8
There's a bunch of benchmarks where newer AMD cpus basically stomp a high end Phenom II.
Gstan will look at all those benchmarks, scratch his head like an ape, and declare Phenom IIs are unequivocally better for gaming (like he said) because they cost less and did about as well in one benchmark.
That is the nature of GStan. (and BFG10K)
Gstan, I wouldn't call Rollo a troll because he did post a valid link to some valid benchmarks, but then Gstan, you could've as easily found a review showing PII beating Faildozer CPUs in games. You can do it, man. Show him you got some anti-bull balls!

