Ha! What the heck are you rambling about?
The article my friend, the one in the op.
My reply - my post...its in reference to the article.
I never said intel has to abide by some stupid formula some guy made up. I can argue 500 hrs on how worthless and meaningless Moores law is. I don't know how or why anyone ever valued it. This is not something I invented.
It is intel who not only promoted but promised, stil promising. It is intel who speaks of such performance gains. So, you see, this is why they should be called out on it.
You can go on for weeks arguing that intel never has to increase performance again, you can have a cookie. But, for some odd reason here is this article and intel obviously feeling the need to sing a totally different song.
And, what you read above....that was my response to it.
The article my friend, the one in the op.
My reply - my post...its in reference to the article.
I never said intel has to abide by some stupid formula some guy made up. I can argue 500 hrs on how worthless and meaningless Moores law is. I don't know how or why anyone ever valued it. This is not something I invented.
It is intel who not only promoted but promised, stil promising. It is intel who speaks of such performance gains. So, you see, this is why they should be called out on it.
You can go on for weeks arguing that intel never has to increase performance again, you can have a cookie. But, for some odd reason here is this article and intel obviously feeling the need to sing a totally different song.
And, what you read above....that was my response to it.