05-06-2016, 10:59 AM
Well...
Either this site reads our forum and ran with it or there is a very sad launch coming soon.
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/40...erformance
It's almost exactly as I was projecting. Sad sad sad.
Maybe, somehow this will all be a false alarm. But reading the post and comments, it seems amd fanatic advocates are out trying to spin this one big time. Claiming 390 performance for less watts is exactly what everyone in the pc market has always wanted. This is ironic....I remember reading thread after thread, pro amd force screaming and yelling how 100 extra watts is meaningless. It barely increases your electric bill, like long drawn out post with formulas and hypothetical usage based on some of the lowest kw per hr rates in the world. But now...here we are seeing them preach that 390 performance for leww watts is the 2nd comming... ..
News flash!!!!
We have had 390 performance for a fraction of the power consumption for years now. It was found in the gm204. Seriously, we had the performance for around 150 watts. If AMD best it at all, by how much realisticly. I am thinking 125watts is too much to ask. But even it is, your looking at 25, 35 watt improvement over a card that will perform in the gm204 performance range. This is incredible...for how freaking sad it's looking.
Geez, thus can't be real....can it?
Either this site reads our forum and ran with it or there is a very sad launch coming soon.
http://www.fudzilla.com/news/graphics/40...erformance
It's almost exactly as I was projecting. Sad sad sad.
Maybe, somehow this will all be a false alarm. But reading the post and comments, it seems amd fanatic advocates are out trying to spin this one big time. Claiming 390 performance for less watts is exactly what everyone in the pc market has always wanted. This is ironic....I remember reading thread after thread, pro amd force screaming and yelling how 100 extra watts is meaningless. It barely increases your electric bill, like long drawn out post with formulas and hypothetical usage based on some of the lowest kw per hr rates in the world. But now...here we are seeing them preach that 390 performance for leww watts is the 2nd comming... ..
News flash!!!!
We have had 390 performance for a fraction of the power consumption for years now. It was found in the gm204. Seriously, we had the performance for around 150 watts. If AMD best it at all, by how much realisticly. I am thinking 125watts is too much to ask. But even it is, your looking at 25, 35 watt improvement over a card that will perform in the gm204 performance range. This is incredible...for how freaking sad it's looking.
Geez, thus can't be real....can it?