06-30-2016, 05:54 AM
What I'd bet on is that the 1060 would consume less than 100W on average while the RX 480 consumes 163W (typical - seen in chart posted above), and STILL beat the 480.
Worse yet, PERF PER WATT is exactly the same as R9 Fury:
![[Image: perfwatt_2560_1440.png]](https://tpucdn.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480/images/perfwatt_2560_1440.png)
If TPU included R9 Nano, this chart would probably show it beating the RX 480 in Perf/W.
Why, oh, why didn't TPU include the Nano?!????? This would've been so bittersweet..
Worse yet, PERF PER WATT is exactly the same as R9 Fury:
![[Image: perfwatt_2560_1440.png]](https://tpucdn.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480/images/perfwatt_2560_1440.png)
If TPU included R9 Nano, this chart would probably show it beating the RX 480 in Perf/W.
Why, oh, why didn't TPU include the Nano?!????? This would've been so bittersweet..

