Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ladies and....errr...well GENTLEMEN, place your bets!
#12
What I'd bet on is that the 1060 would consume less than 100W on average while the RX 480 consumes 163W (typical - seen in chart posted above), and STILL beat the 480. 

Worse yet, PERF PER WATT is exactly the same as R9 Fury:

[Image: perfwatt_2560_1440.png]

If TPU included R9 Nano, this chart would probably show it beating the RX 480 in Perf/W.

Why, oh, why didn't TPU include the Nano?!?????   This would've been so bittersweet..
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Ladies and....errr...well GENTLEMEN, place your bets! - by BoFox - 06-30-2016, 05:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)