Posts: 1,202
Threads: 295
Joined: Feb 2015
NASA's Shuttle-Era Engines Have One Last Job
8-15-2015
If it isn't broken, don't fix it. That's the mentality at NASA, which is test-firing the RS-25 rocket engines that will serve as the main engines for the Space Launch System.
These are the same engines that powered the Space Shuttles — literally. The design has proved so reliable NASA has been refurbishing and reusing the same rockets for 34 years, 14 of them have already been to space.
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 295
Joined: Feb 2015
I never heard of this new Space Launch System until saw this article.
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 295
Joined: Feb 2015
08-17-2015, 12:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2015, 12:50 PM by dmcowen674.)
(08-17-2015, 12:42 PM)gstanford Wrote: An absolutely terrible idea given how shockingly bad those engines were.
They were NASA's first engines designed (mostly) without Werner Von Braun and it shows.
Constant fuel leaks and had to be rebuilt after every single flight (which is why it took so long to service shuttles between launches). They would take the engines from one shuttle and use them in another while its engines were being rebuilt.
Not to mention putting complex reusable engines into a single use rocket makes no sense (though the clip did say they want to do a modern redesign and cost reduction to produce a single use version of the engine).
Are you sure the engines were at fault? I thought the issue was the re-usable three section boosters that were the main problem.
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 295
Joined: Feb 2015
(08-17-2015, 01:03 PM)gstanford Wrote: The main engines were just as bad, it was a miracle none of them ever failed in flight.
Given the amount of thrust they provide for the size and none failed in flight does not sound as terrible as you are making them out to be.
Have you built a better one?