![\"\"](\"http:\/\/i0.wp.com\/alienbabeltech.com\/main\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/november-2008-builders-guide.jpg?resize=500%2C200\" "\\"November")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Written by: Leon Hyman<\/strong><\/p>\n This guide is to be used as a reference when purchasing new hardware or upgrading. The entire guide will be based on the price\/performance or bang-for-buck ideology. If you would like to know more about this series and the writer, you can find it here<\/a> .<\/p>\n Disclaimer:<\/em> These recommendations are solely based on facts, my experience and personal opinions.<\/em><\/p>\n In each section, there will be five parts listed in the following levels (based on price<\/strong>):<\/p>\n Please note that:<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Based on the prices of the current processor line-ups, it is difficult to see why anyone would recommend a single core processor and as such the only recommendations that I will make are for dual and quad core.<\/p>\n Dual vs Quad Debate<\/span> The other concept behind this debate has been “future-proofing”. Some argue that this is a silly premise to base a purchase on, given that there is always something better just around the corner and with that always comes the price reduction of current hardware. Those that agree with this line of argument are usually people with more frequent upgrade cycles. Those that do not upgrade often, tend to defend the “future-proofing” of their machines.<\/p>\n My recommendation is that if you don’t<\/em> plan to upgrade within the next two years, you will be better off buying a quad core processor now. For the others, grabbing a fast dual core now will be a strong choice. The other option is however, to wait for Intel’s new line of processors, Core i7 (more commonly known as Nehalem), which just launched November 17…but that is a whole different story. I will allow the dust cloud around the i7 launch to settle. Look out for more about Core i7 and related hardware in our December issue.<\/p>\n As always, all purchases are defined by what matters most….your budget. So here we go…the following are my recommendations.<\/p>\n <\/p>\nINTRODUCTION<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
Entry<\/div>\n<\/li>\nBudget<\/div>\n<\/li>\nMainstream<\/div>\n<\/li>\nPerformance<\/div>\n<\/li>\nEnthusiast<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
As the site grows, there might be a need to sub-divide this guide to make it more specific and to elaborate on any particular component.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
For convenience purposes only, the links provided are to<\/em> Newegg.com<\/em><\/a><\/span> which is a leading online retailer of computer hardware. I will advise, however, that you shop around and get yourself the best possible deal.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nCPUs \/ PROCESSORS<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
\n<\/span>This is a debate that has been ongoing for the last two years or so but it is only recently that we in the tech community have somewhat come to a consensus. It has been shown that, whether you overclock or not, faster dual cores will outperform slower quads in applications (including games) that only make use of two cores. Quad cores start to pull ahead with power hungry applications that make use of more than two cores.<\/p>\n