Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GM200/Titan X announced with slow DP
#14
(03-18-2015, 03:57 PM)gstanford Wrote: Of course it is an artificial limitation. They can clock FP64 at ratios other than 1/32 if they want. Pro cards are usually clocked at 1/3 fp32 rate.

They do this with scheduler timing.

It's not about the clock! It's about the number of FP64 units!

In the same review:

"This means we’re looking at the same SMMs as on GM204, featuring 128 FP32 CUDA cores per SMM, a 512Kbit register file, and just 4 FP64 ALUs per SMM, leading to a puny native FP64 rate of just 1/32. As a result, all of that space in GK110 occupied by FP64 ALUs and other compute hardware – and NVIDIA won’t reveal quite how much space that was – has been reinvested in FP32 ALUs and other graphics-centric hardware."

I must be debating with a wall here.. Or you are just trolling.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
GM200/Titan X announced with slow DP - by Picao84 - 03-17-2015, 11:30 PM
RE: GM200/Titan X announced with slow DP - by Picao84 - 03-18-2015, 03:59 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)