11-18-2017, 03:38 AM
(11-18-2017, 12:42 AM)SickBeast Wrote:(11-16-2017, 05:09 PM)RolloTheGreat Wrote:I think most people would agree that a 10" larger screen with a VA panel and local dimming is vastly superior to a smaller TV with an IPS panel and no local dimming. Sorry to have to tell you this. Brand loyalty gets you nowhere. Hisense is a disruptive brand and their TVs are excellent.(11-16-2017, 08:37 AM)SickBeast Wrote: I don't think Rollo is doing anything too extravagant actually. He makes a decent income and the cost of living where he lives is ridiculously low. Heck, I have a nicer TV than him and I'm sure my house costs way more where I live. I also have two kids in daycare. You've got to live your life to the fullest, our time in this life is limited. I know that I personally went through a long period in my youth where I didn't have a lot. I think it's fine to spoil yourself sometimes if you have the means, provided that you're not going overboard.
If I had a $100,000 Wisconsin home I would probably buy a cottage and a boat also. You kind of need the big SUV to tow one of those also.
It feels strange defending Rollo here, however I have seen much better examples of a life of excess compared to how he lives. I know people with 16,000 square foot houses here. And actually even that doesn't seem all that excessive to me. The house is absolutely beautiful and if I had the means to afford it I would absolutely buy one. Lucky for me I get to visit whenever I want and they take good care of us when we go there. My TV is still nicer than theirs though.
Well, its a $300,000 Wisconsin home, but in general I agree.
(Although 65" Sony HDR might be a tie to some compared with 75" HiSense)
I agree on the 10", I've just seen bad reviews of HiSense. What Sharp model is it? If its a quality TV I'll gladly agree with you.


