06-19-2015, 09:03 AM
It's not as contradictory as it seems.
To a laissez faire capitalist like Trump, who understands American business, government exists to provide a good environment for business to operate in. He understands that we all either work for corps, or the money we do work for is somehow impacted by corps, and that our fortunes as a people rise and fall on corporate jobs and profits.
To a lawyer/professor socialist like Obama, corps are seen as a piggy bank to raid to divert money to the poor, who vote for guys like Obama. Obama endorses pointless idiotic laws like the "Bring Jobs Home" Act, which would have offered corps a whole 20% tax break on moving expenses to bring factories back to the US so he can say he's "pro jobs". (ignorant of the fact that it would still leave 80% of the moving costs with the corps, and that the law does not address any of the reasons the jobs left in the first place)
Trump would have laughed at the Bring Jobs Home Act, not pimped it on tv like Obama.
To a laissez faire capitalist like Trump, who understands American business, government exists to provide a good environment for business to operate in. He understands that we all either work for corps, or the money we do work for is somehow impacted by corps, and that our fortunes as a people rise and fall on corporate jobs and profits.
To a lawyer/professor socialist like Obama, corps are seen as a piggy bank to raid to divert money to the poor, who vote for guys like Obama. Obama endorses pointless idiotic laws like the "Bring Jobs Home" Act, which would have offered corps a whole 20% tax break on moving expenses to bring factories back to the US so he can say he's "pro jobs". (ignorant of the fact that it would still leave 80% of the moving costs with the corps, and that the law does not address any of the reasons the jobs left in the first place)
Trump would have laughed at the Bring Jobs Home Act, not pimped it on tv like Obama.