07-25-2015, 09:08 AM
Interesting insights, thanks Rollo.
The company must be assuming that everybody who has solar panels are quite wealthy, so that the $57 surcharge should not really cause too big of an issue with them. If I were the guy on that farm, I'd still go solar anyway, even if paying a surcharge of $85/mo. Wealthy people could easily organize class-action lawsuits and possibly win a case there. Perhaps find a way to convince the government to give rebates or incentives for going "green"... like with buying electric/hybrid cars.
The company must be assuming that everybody who has solar panels are quite wealthy, so that the $57 surcharge should not really cause too big of an issue with them. If I were the guy on that farm, I'd still go solar anyway, even if paying a surcharge of $85/mo. Wealthy people could easily organize class-action lawsuits and possibly win a case there. Perhaps find a way to convince the government to give rebates or incentives for going "green"... like with buying electric/hybrid cars.
Ok with science that the big bang theory requires that fundamental scientific laws do not exist for the first few minutes, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws... 