From the link in the OP:
What was this BS about all NV cards from 4xx and up (Fermi and Kepler) "ready for DX12" that Poppin and Gstan loved to spout all over the forums??? Would these cards even do SFR rendering properly with games designed for DX12, with decent scaling? We'll see.
Even GTX 980 Ti (Maxwell 2.0) cannot do the job as nicely on DX12 as DX11, while AMD's cards receive about 2x performance boost over DX11. In effect, if Fury was included in the benchmark, AMD would be mopping the floor with TitanX at every resolution, let alone the 99% frame time.
Quote:On the other hand, Nvidia's cards are very much designed for DX11. Anandtech found that any pre-Maxwell GPU from the company (that is, pre-980 Ti, 980, 970, and 960) had to either execute in serial or pre-empt to move tasks ahead of each other. That's not a problem under DX11, but it potentially becomes one under DX12.
What was this BS about all NV cards from 4xx and up (Fermi and Kepler) "ready for DX12" that Poppin and Gstan loved to spout all over the forums??? Would these cards even do SFR rendering properly with games designed for DX12, with decent scaling? We'll see.
Even GTX 980 Ti (Maxwell 2.0) cannot do the job as nicely on DX12 as DX11, while AMD's cards receive about 2x performance boost over DX11. In effect, if Fury was included in the benchmark, AMD would be mopping the floor with TitanX at every resolution, let alone the 99% frame time.
Ok with science that the big bang theory requires that fundamental scientific laws do not exist for the first few minutes, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws... 