Gstan is just an extremely angry atheist, that's all. He can believe in the "authority" of the institution of science all he wants, and entertain the massively world-dominated speculation theories like the string theory, dark mass and dark matter, big bang, and macro-evolution. But since 99.999+% of these "believers" do not know the exact data and the mathematical equations for themselves (actually, most ordinary physicists with a Ph.D. do not know how to apply Einstein's Theory of Relativity mathematical equations, and there isn't a single person on Earth today who can even understand half of Maxwell's (not Nvidia's Maxwell) equations from the 1800's), they're basically eating the whole platter without even taking a grain of salt.
The Big Bang theory was invented by a science fiction writer, which quickly got popular with the cartoon diagrams in the late 40's and really took off in the 50's. For the Big Bang to require that 10^90+ molecules of Hydrogen came out of pure vacuum, while bending all scientific laws (strong force, weak force, electrostatic force, and even defying the law of gravitation), it sounds frighteningly religious to me. The declared formulation of the big bang theory requires that the above universal laws did not apply until after the first few minutes after the big bang took place.
The strange thing is that the 1st Amendment is allowing for this to be taught at all public schools and universities as the holy grail of truth while allowing very little freedom for other popular theories to be taught as well.
This is honestly the dumbest religion I've ever encountered in my life. Parallel universes might just as well be heaven and hell, eh? For the Big Bang to defy all laws of physics, bring everything out of absolute nothingness (vacuum), and create intelligence and so on... might just as well be the illogical creation magic (defying all laws) while refusing to mention the creator.
Funny times.
Red shifts and radiocarbon dating just need to be better understood by the "conservative" traditional scientists, and not continue to be taken at face value (which is absolutely embarrassing for science as of 2015).
So, it's ok for the big bang to defy all physical laws, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws?
EDIT- I know Sickbeast is tired of religion talk, but Ocre made a good point about traditional science bordering into all kinds of physics-defying theories, matter originating from nothing, parallel universes, etc.. So, what is really true science now? I just want real science, not quack science to be pushed down our children's throats, that's all.
The Big Bang theory was invented by a science fiction writer, which quickly got popular with the cartoon diagrams in the late 40's and really took off in the 50's. For the Big Bang to require that 10^90+ molecules of Hydrogen came out of pure vacuum, while bending all scientific laws (strong force, weak force, electrostatic force, and even defying the law of gravitation), it sounds frighteningly religious to me. The declared formulation of the big bang theory requires that the above universal laws did not apply until after the first few minutes after the big bang took place.
The strange thing is that the 1st Amendment is allowing for this to be taught at all public schools and universities as the holy grail of truth while allowing very little freedom for other popular theories to be taught as well.
This is honestly the dumbest religion I've ever encountered in my life. Parallel universes might just as well be heaven and hell, eh? For the Big Bang to defy all laws of physics, bring everything out of absolute nothingness (vacuum), and create intelligence and so on... might just as well be the illogical creation magic (defying all laws) while refusing to mention the creator.
Funny times.
Red shifts and radiocarbon dating just need to be better understood by the "conservative" traditional scientists, and not continue to be taken at face value (which is absolutely embarrassing for science as of 2015).
So, it's ok for the big bang to defy all physical laws, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws?
EDIT- I know Sickbeast is tired of religion talk, but Ocre made a good point about traditional science bordering into all kinds of physics-defying theories, matter originating from nothing, parallel universes, etc.. So, what is really true science now? I just want real science, not quack science to be pushed down our children's throats, that's all.
Ok with science that the big bang theory requires that fundamental scientific laws do not exist for the first few minutes, but not ok for the creator to defy these laws... 