12-20-2015, 05:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-20-2015, 06:34 AM by SteelCrysis.)
Just an interesting note:
The notion that privacy advocates could be put to death is not that far fetched. Advocating the use of software for everyone, including child predators, when that software would make it easier for them and other criminals to get away with their crimes and the advocates know it, is just one step away from encouraging people to commit a horrible crime even after they know it is being committed. The latter was the legal principle that justified the hanging of Julius Streicher by the IMT: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.p...2#p1539922
Edit: It also has a potential basis in U.S. law: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.p...b#p1540013
Edit 2: All of this would only apply to people who advocate privacy software in general or specifically. Those who confine themselves to to reforming the NSA or restricting it do not deserve death.
Edit 3: On second thought, forget about the death penalty. It's too severe.
The notion that privacy advocates could be put to death is not that far fetched. Advocating the use of software for everyone, including child predators, when that software would make it easier for them and other criminals to get away with their crimes and the advocates know it, is just one step away from encouraging people to commit a horrible crime even after they know it is being committed. The latter was the legal principle that justified the hanging of Julius Streicher by the IMT: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.p...2#p1539922
Edit: It also has a potential basis in U.S. law: http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.p...b#p1540013
Edit 2: All of this would only apply to people who advocate privacy software in general or specifically. Those who confine themselves to to reforming the NSA or restricting it do not deserve death.
Edit 3: On second thought, forget about the death penalty. It's too severe.