02-02-2016, 10:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2016, 10:55 AM by SteelCrysis.)
To be fair, the lawsuit merely cites Backblaze as additional evidence. But they still shouldn't have cited it, since it's a bogus report, with Seagate's failure rate massively skewed upwards by using 2007 drives that were known to be especially unreliable.
Edit: For anyone who needs a reminder:
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/6028/d...index.html
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/st...rch-1.html
Edit: For anyone who needs a reminder:
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/6028/d...index.html
http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/st...rch-1.html

