02-10-2016, 02:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-10-2016, 02:37 PM by RolloTheGreat.)
(02-10-2016, 10:04 AM)gstanford Wrote: Doesn't change the fact that sweet spots exist Rollo. The fact that you are too stuck up for them is irrelevant. They are relevant to the vast majority of consumers.
They are relevant for everyone which I have been saying over and over.
You just can't understand that what constitutes a sweet spot for you is not a sweet spot for others.
Let's try an example:
Lets say you and Mrs. GStan make $75K a year, Mrs. Rollo and I make $200K a year, and Mrs Skywalker and Ben make $350K a year.
Do you honestly think we're all going to consider a Yaris the "sweet spot" of cars?
Or that we'd all consider a HiSense the "sweet spot" of TVs?
Or that saving $40 a year on power would matter to all three of us?
Of course not.
We would all have different price points that would be what we would consider the "best value" or an "amount worth saving".
Doesn't have anything to do with being "stuck up", doesn't have anything to do with "wiping your arse with $100 bills".
Only means we all have a different income, and have adjusted our value curve to match it.
Do you honestly think many people around the globe with over $10K month income are driving Yaris's or consider them the best value for cars? Seriously?
They might think a Toyota Avalon is the best value though, and the people living on over $20K a month might consider a Lexus 300 the "best value".
Has nothing whatsoever to do with "what most people think" and has everything to do with what they earned at their jobs.
I can guarantee you that if your household income doubled this year, by next year you would have a different "sweet spot" for about everything. Would not mean you had become "stuck up" would only mean your were living as well as you could within your means.