Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
U.S. Court says public have no Constitutional right to record police
#9
(02-26-2016, 07:39 AM)happy medium Wrote:
(02-25-2016, 07:17 PM)RolloTheGreat Wrote: If you don't commit crimes or fight with them you will probably be safe Dave.

I live in Philly and your not exactly safe even if your not a criminal. Philly police have no problem giving you the old Bristol stomp and saying "oh sorry wrong guy". Cops are given to much power and never are held responsible. I'm guessing you live in a neighborhood that has very little crime and is mostly white?

Cop's "mama-boys" think they're all safe and snuggly - cops love these mama-boys who think they're safe under the mama hen's wings.  That is, until Rollo has a super-sexy daughter.  She grows up, and gets engaged with a cop that she was dating for a couple months.  Rollo sees the cop beating her up, and tries to videorecord the whole thing.  The cop arrests Rollo for doing this, and presses him with several other bogus arrest charges like assault and battery, resisting arrest, etc..  While Rollo is in jail, his daughter breaks up with the cop.  The cop then invites a few of his other cop friends to gang-rape her.  Of course, she'd never tell anybody else, because nobody would ever believe her, even Rollo (in his normal state before he went to jail). 

Rolleyes
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: U.S. Court says public have no Constitutional right to record police - by BoFox - 02-26-2016, 11:15 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)