Galaxy’s GT 430 – Introducing Nvidia’s new GF108 multi-media GPU
Overclocking
Nvidia’s GT 430 overclocks well as does the rest of the Fermi family. Enter Galaxy’s overclocking tool, Xtreme Tuner HD with our settings at stock values:
We were not content to play with Galaxy’s GT 430 at its factory-set clocks and so we pushed it to near its limit. However, this editor has his own set of criteria for overclocking the Galaxy GT 430 further.
- Voltage is kept stock. Not many people are willing to boost voltage on even an inexpensive video card.
- It must be 100% stable and continue to scale with each increase of any clock.
- The fan must not go over its factory-set 52% with stock cooling only; no profiles were created.
Here are our Galaxy GT 430 clocks:
————————— Reference >> Galaxy’s OC >> new OC:
- Graphics Clock – 700 MHz >> 825 MHz
- Processor Clock – 1400 MHz >> 1650 MHz
- Memory Clock – 3600 MHz >> 3680 MHz
An overclock of +125 MHz on the reference Galaxy GT 430’s core – from 700 MHz to 825 MHz with our overclock – brought us some solid performance increases in every case. However, our DDR3 did not want to overclock very far. This may change later on if Nvidia decides to allow support for DDR5.
Check out our overclock and during gaming the temperatures which never even went above the 50s C nor did the card make any noticeable noise under full load:
Although we had very little time to fine tune it, we are pretty sure we are near the limit of both our DDR3 and our core. Each sample is different and your own results may vary considerably from ours. We did not raise the voltage or the fan and you may be able to get even a higher overclock if you are willing to do this. Running Furmark it never overheated nor could we hear the GT 430’s VGA cooling fan ramp up. It stayed cool under extreme stress and it will not drain your wallet with its low 49W TDP specification.
Overclocked Performance
We overclocked our games at the same settings that we used all throughout this review and in most cases, we see good to excellent scaling with clock speeds. In a few cases, the +125 MHz overclock on the core and +20 MHz on the vRAM brings a game from barely playable to playable.
Impressive! Just like the rest of the Fermi family that we have tested. We also usually get a much nicer VGA cooling fan solution from Galaxy over the reference cooler, which will keep your overclock cool and quiet. This is a real testimonial to Galaxy’s excellent in-house design.
Power Usage
Power usage is important for many people as a very hot running GPU is not only not “green”, it throws warm air into your room that your air conditioner must work extra hard to compensate for. Of course, these small GPUs put out very little heat and use little energy compared to the GTX 480 or GTX 470. In fact, the 49 average watts that are required to run GT 430 comes solely from the PCIe slot and there is no additional PCIe power cable connector. In addition, the Galaxy GT 430 is a very short card – much shorter than the GT 220 which allows it to fit into some very small cases.
Testing with FurMark’s worst case, Hot-as-Hell GPU burning test, we noted that the temperatures never even climbed into the 60sF. “Pass” with flying colors on the power usage and thermal tests!
while i understand that it’s nice to have gts 450 and hd 5750 scores for a bit of context, can i ask why you haven’t included the hd 5570 and/or hd 5670 as, being the gt 430’s main competitors, they are rather important in terms of how much value this card actually is…?
Thanks for your comment. As reviewers, we use what we have. I do not have HD 5570 nor HD 5670 to use for comparison.
However, as I pointed out in my Galaxy GT 430 evaluation, this is only “Part 1”. Part two will cover HD 4290 IG and using GT 430 as a dedicated PhysX card. If I can get ahold of HD 5570, I will also include it.
As I understand it, GT 430 is primarily a HTPC card first with an emphasis on BluRay 3D movies. It is a direct successor to GT 220 which serves a similar purpose in Nvidia’s lineup. As a successor, it works much better than the GT 220 which will probably get further discounted. And the GT 430 success will also depend on its market pricing.
@arcade flyer,
Since the HD5670 card costs the same as the 430 (79.99 on newegg), and typically beats it by a large margin (from the other review sites ive seen). I agree it makes little sense that its not compaired with the 430. Even the HD5570 should beat it by a little bit, and be selling cheaper. The 5670 in the benchmarks at tomshardware/HardOCP/Anandtech, is almost pulling twice as much frames pr secound in most of the tests (games).
@apoppin,
if its emphasis is on bluRay 3d movies, why isnt in the review? instead of 21 games tested. Also could you test out ATIs blueray 3d? in 10.3 I believe they added support for it, and that “middleware vendors” now have glasses out for it too.
You seem to miss that there is a “Part Two” part of my GT 430 review coming. And although I do not have a HD 5570 or HD 5670 (Leon has them in Jamaica; there was no time to get the GT 430 to him for his evaluation). I will also save this card for evaluation when the HD 6500/6600 series is out.
There are many ways to evaluate a product and my approach focused on the GT 430 as a successor to GT 220. The GT 220 was not a strong gaming card; the GT 430 is much faster, yet GT 220 had a solid and successful place in Nvidia’s lineup. In this way, the GT 430 succeeds. And as I stated, “price” and market positioning will determine its level of success. It also appears to excel at 3D BluRay playback which leaves it in a rather unique position for now.
Now this is a tech site where each editor has his own interests and specialties. My evaluations and BFG10K’s reviews are from the perspective of a gamer. MrK is very interested in video playback and encoding and you will always see that featured in his evaluations.
Soon we expect to receive a 3D vision kit from Nvidia and we will be very happy to evaluate 3D video playback and 3D games in future reviews. We are always looking to bring more to our readers.
@apoppin
thanks for replying. i appreciate that you can only use what you have. of course the gt430 is a light/mid card geared towards hd media decoding and casual gaming rather than hd gaming. anyway, i look forward to part 2 for a more complete picture.
quotes from AnandTech:
“..GT 430 simply isn’t competitive with AMD’s 5570 and 5670 in gaming performance..”
Some games the 5670 has almost twice the fps rates, like in Battlefield bad company 2, at 1280×1024 medium quality settings Chase bench. The 430 is scoreing around 36 fps vs the 5670s 62 fps.
Thats a HUGE differnce, for 2 cards priced the same.
“..If image quality absolutely matters to you, then the Radeon 5570 is definitely the card to get for the time being”
HQV 2 benchmark for image quality, the 5570/5670 cards score ALOT higher.
“So if NVIDIA stumbles on image quality, where do they excel? 3D stereoscopy.”
so… 430 is a card for people that want 3d Steroscopy, only how many people actually have a tv that has 120+ mhz refresh rates?
To answer your question,
Improvements in technology and content availability will lead to “tremendous growth” in 3DTV sales in the next few years, according to a study out of DisplaySearch. The research outfit forecast 3DTV sales of 3.2 million this year and a whopping 90 million by 2014.
-Source: TWICE (10/13) Home Media Magazine (10/13)
GT 430 is a great successor to GT 220 – which was no flop. I am certain any IQ issues will be fixed in drivers and it will serve as an excellent HTPC videocard that can do light to moderate gaming.
I am very interested in this card. I like the lower memory speed and the large fan. The gaming performance does not interest me. A 20 or 30 dollar price difference is not a big deal either. What this shopper wants to know is which has more reliable drivers, Nvidia or AMD. My needs are for HTPC. Mostly Internet TV and Video Streaming. People with new HDTV just want somting to get an HDMI connection with audio going on. I mostly look at the power consumption,heat and noise specs.I am not familar with Galaxy but it is so far the best design I have seen for my needs.
Nvidia’s and AMD’s drivers and support are both top notch. You can’t go wrong with either company for your needs.
I had recently called Galaxy’s “US” support line in regard to Xtreme Tuner HD. Not only was the person on the phone unfamiliar with the program, but for being the North American support line he was not the most fluent in English. I can speak 3 languages unfortunately, I’m not well versed in Hindi.
I later emailed Galaxy support with a simple and specific question. It’s now been over a week and I have yet to hear back.
I’ve also read on numerous websites that support for Galaxy is horrible and pointless. When you called and spoke with them, what was asked?
I can certainly call Galaxy tech support again.
However, there is a Galaxy representative that responds to our forum member’s issues. I would be glad to put him in contact with you. Why not sign up on our forum and post your issue there?
Okay, excellent post along with fair comments coming from your readers, I have shared this post on a handful of social book-marking sites because it’s a very good read, thank you.
I am glad that I noticed this website , exactly the right information that I was looking for! .
Hi, I do believe this is a great website. I stumbledupon it 😉 I am going to return yet again since I book marked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help other people.