11-06-2016, 09:23 PM
(11-06-2016, 07:24 PM)RolloTheGreat Wrote:You're not impressed with HDR? You don't notice any difference?(11-06-2016, 05:43 PM)gstanford Wrote: LOL!
Trust me when I tell you Trollo, I'm going to roast you over your PS4 Pro is crossfire claims in the fullness of time.
I'll wait the whole 4 days until launch and then either admit I'm wrong or add this to the long list of erroneous disinformation you have posted.
(11-06-2016, 05:43 PM)gstanford Wrote: Cheap 4K TV's may well be 4:2:2 Chroma as a cost cutting measure. I'm not recommending (and didn't) anybody purchase the Visio, just pointed out that many people have used Visio TV's as monitors in the past with good results.As we're only talking about this Vizio TV, what do the other ones matter? You may not have recommended this TV, but all you said about it is that people don't need a tuner, 4:4:4 chroma, or upscaling on a TV. By trivializing those issues, and ignoring the others (flickering, response time, and viewing angles) AND saying the review was rigged, you recommended this TV in effect. Or you are just trolling.
(11-06-2016, 05:43 PM)gstanford Wrote: If Visio is cost cutting internal Chroma resolution to inflate profits and save costs then that situation may not continue much longer. I'd recommend anyone wanting a 4K TV right now to ensure that they get one that is HDR capable. That is more important than the TV also being 4K.
As a person who has owned a HDR TV for 4 months I would say the jury is still out on that one. This TV has no HDR.