TwitterFacebookYouTubeRSS
formats

NVIDIA’s GTX 480 Performance Testing



Lost Planet

LostPlanet thumb NVIDIAs GTX 480 Performance Testing

Lost Planet: Extreme Condition is a Capcom port of an Xbox 360 game. It takes place on the icy planet of E.D.N. III which is filled with monsters, pirates, big guns, and huge bosses. This frozen world highlights high dynamic range lighting (HDR) as the snow-white environment reflects blinding sunlight as DX10 particle systems toss snow and ice all around. The game looks great in both DirectX 9 and 10 and there isn’t really much of a difference between the two versions except perhaps shadows. Unfortunately, the DX10 version doesn’t look that much better when you’re actually playing the game and it still runs slower than the DX9 version.

We use the in-game performance test from the retail copy of Lost Planet and updated through Steam to the latest version for our runs. This run isn’t completely scripted as the creatures act a little differently each time you run it, requiring multiple runs. Lost Planet’s Snow and Cave demos are run continuously by the performance test and blend into each other.Here are our benchmark results with the more demanding benchmark, Snow. All settings are fully maxed out in-game including 4xAA/16xAF.

Let’s start with 2560X1600.  Please note that there is a typo in the GTX 480′s maximum FPS; instead of 85, it should read 52 FPS.

    LP 251 NVIDIAs GTX 480 Performance Testing

    Now at 1920×1200 resolution:

    LP 19 NVIDIAs GTX 480 Performance Testing

    Finally at 1680×1050:

    LP 161 NVIDIAs GTX 480 Performance Testing

    All of our top cards are tightly grouped. For the averages, the GTX 480 edges the top two Radeons but then stumbles very slightly compared to the HD 5870 at 2560×1600. Performance is too close to call.

  • http://www.mcs.net.tf Aaron

    and err, Call of Defence? Dont you mean Duty? xD

  • apoppin

    Thanks, Aaron .. already fixed.

  • http://www.hardocp.com/ Q-BZ from HOCP

    I’m glad I had some more time on my hands and could give you a much closer look. Very impressive work and an impressive site. Added to my bookmarks. :)

  • Bo_Fox

    Great review.. I suspect the GTX 480 to be just like HD2900XT was back then on 80nm. At least it’s not as much of a “failure” as the HD2900XT, but it’s way more power-hungry. True, the HD2900XT was considerably slower than 8800 Ultra, but the power consumption and heat output was pretty much the same. Heck, the consumption was actually equal to less hungry 8800GTX according to some reviews.

    Anyways, the point here is that Nvidia made sure that they came out at the top with the fastest single GPU card but at some cost. I mean, the real point here is (LOL) that the Fermi architecture appears to be designed with the future in mind, in the same way that the R600 was designed. With a reduced number of TMU’s (albeit more efficient ones), the ratio seems better suited with the number of shaders for better scaling in the future. On a smaller 28nm shrink, we’d be seeing a far better design with at least double the specifications for more than 100% increase in performance (similar to RV770 versus the original R600) while consuming even less power.