Platform upgrade: Core i7-920 vs i7-3770 at 4.2GHz featuring ECS Golden Series Motherboard and Kingston
More Tests
Super Pi
Here is the test and we choose 1 million digits.
First up is Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz.
Here is Super Pi on the Core i7-3770K at 4.2GHz
Ivy is faster by a second. And this is a single-threaded application. Please continue on to Fritz Chess Bench.
Fritz Chess Bench
Fritz Chess Benchmark is found within the game’s program files and basically it crunches numbers to test your processor’s speed. Deep Fritz takes advantage of massive calculations and multi-threaded performance to work any CPU fully. It loads all threads 100% and will drive your CPU temperatures way up.
First the Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz:
Besides showing relative speed when compared to a P3 1.0GHz CPU, it also shows the nodes completed. The faster your CPU, the more nodes completed. next up is the Core i7-3770K at 4.2GHz.
Here in a multi-threaded benchmark, Ivy Bridge at 4.2GHz is faster clock-for-clock than our aging and overclocked-to-the-max Core i7-920.
CustomPC Benchmark
CustomPC benchmark use widely available open-source applications to carry out the tasks that most of us perform on a regular basis. There are three tests, each of which measure different aspects of a PC’s performance. These tests themselves are not synthetic benchmarks but instead they use real world image, video and multi-tasking tasks to test the performance of your computer.
The tests are:
- GIMP Image Editing
- H.264 Video Encoding
- Multi-tasking
First these tests are run on the overclocked to 4.2GHz Core i7-920.
As usual we test next with the Core i7-3770K also at 4.2GHz.
Here are the results of Custom PC benchmarking expressed first as a graph and then as a chart:
Ivy Bridge is much faster at video encoding and it wins in all three tests on our ECS motherboard while we observed on our mATX Gigabyte Z77 motherboard, the older CPU was slightly faster at multi-tasking and image editing.
CINEBENCH
CINEBENCH is based on MAXON’s professional 3D content creation suite, CINEMA 4D. This latest 11.5 version of CINEBENCH can test up to 64 processor threads accurately and automatically.
First the i7-920 at 4.2GHz with the GTX 680 at reference clocks
Next, the Ivy Bridge Core i7 at 4.2GHz with the reference GTX 680 and the same settings.
Here is the Graph.
Ivy Bridge is much faster in both tests.
X264
Basically this test encodes a HD video clip into a x264 video file. The first pass is very quick and the second one is much slower and much more demanding of a task as it does the actual encoding. This benchmark is heavily mult-threaded. First up is the Core i7-920 at 4.2GHz
And now the Core i7-3770K.
As we can see, both passes are much quicker on Ivy Bridge. The newest architecture is favored in a heavily-multi-threaded task.
The next series of tests is going to focus on the hard disk drive (HDD) or SSD as a performance upgrade for both PCs
Crystal Disk Mark
CrystalDiskMark is a HDD benchmark utility for your hard drive that enables you to measure sequential and random read/write speeds. Here are some key features of “CrystalDiskMark”:
- Measure sequential reads/writes speed
- Measure random 512KB, 4KB, 4KB (Queue Depth=32) reads/writes speed
First up is the i7-920
Now the 3770K
The Ivy Bridge platform is quicker. The writes differences would be much less due to using less expensive NAND in the HyperX 3K SSD than they are due to the higher bandwidth of the Ivy Bridge platform.
HD Tune
HD Tune is a hard disk utility which has the following functions:
- Benchmark measures the performance of:
- Transfer Rate
- Access Time
- CPU Usage
- Burst Rate
- Random Access test
- Write benchmark
- Hard Disk information which includes partition information, supported features, firmware version, serial number, disk capacity, buffer size, transfer mode
- Hard Disk Health
- S.M.A.R.T. Information (Self-Monitoring Analysis and Reporting Technology)
- Power On Time
- Error scan
- Temperature display
The Bloomfield platform is up first.
Next the i7-3770K
These two Kingston Hyper-X SSDs are very close in performance and we will compare them to each other in an upcoming evaluation with another Kingston consumer-grade SSD next month.
AS SSD
AS SSD is especially designed for Solid State Drives (SSD). The tool contains synthetic and practice tests. The synthetic tests determine the sequential and random read and write performance of the SSD without use of the operating system caches. In Seq-test the program measures how long it takes to read and write a 1 GB file. In the 4K test, read and write performance for random 4K blocks are determined. The 4K-64-thrd test are similar to the 4K procedure except that the read and write operations on 64 threads are distributed as in the usual start of a program.
In the copying test, two large ISO file folders are created, programs with many small files, and a games folder with small and large files. These three folders are copied by the OS copy command with the cache turned on. The practice tests show performance with simultaneous read and write operations
AS SSD gives an overall “score” after it runs the benchmarks. These scores and comparisons are summed up in the performance summary charts.
Now the i7-3770k
Ivy’s plaform is faster.
ATTO
ATTO is a disk benchmark. The ATTO Disk Benchmark measures a storage system;s performance with various transfer sizes and test lengths for reads and writes. Options are available to customize the tests, including queue depth, overlapped I/O and even a comparison mode.
First up is i7-920.
Now 3770K
Very similar results.
HD Tach
HD Tach is a low level hardware benchmark for random access read/write storage devices iincluding SSDs and HDDs. HD Tach uses custom device drivers and low level Windows interfaces to determine the physical performance of the device.
Here is the Long Bench with Bloomfield.
Now we repeat the same test with Ivy Bridge with identical settings.
fg
With this test, we are just measuring the slight differences between the SSDs. There really isn’t any except in the quality of the NAND.
Folder copy
Here is a task that we all carry out and it shows the superiority of USB 3.0 over 2.0. Only Ivy Bridge natively supports it for Intel platforms; not even Sandy Bridge. Ivy Bridge also brings PCIe 3.0 although it is available to Sandy Bridge owners through BIOS updates for suitable motherboards.
Here we copy 10GB from a 32GB Kingston DataTraveler Elite 3.0 USB Flash drive to a folder on the desktop. First up is the i7-920 platform and it takes 5 minutes and 24 seconds.
Now the 3770K, to copy from the flash drive is 2 minutes and 35 seconds. It’s more than twice as quick!
Now we copy the same 10GB folder from our SSD’s desktop – one folder on the SSD to another – 122 seconds on Bloomfield and 90 seconds on Ivy! And to copy from the desktop to the Kingston DataTraveler Elite 3.0 takes 7 minutes 33 seconds on Bloomfield and 5 minutes 53 on Ivy.
Check out the charts and see how much time you have to waste with older tech.
We found this is quite practical as we moved our 104GB Steam folder from one SSD to another in under 10 minutes using the Ivy Bridge platform. In contrast, it seemed to take forever on the Bloomfield platform and we lost track of the time as we went off to do something else.
Now we move on to game-related benchmarks and games. Next up are the synthetics.
No offense, but there are two main summary charts that are identical to each other. Is the second one supposed to show different games?
Don’t forget about the “[insert chart]” part! 😛
None taken. Thanks for pointing it out!
Fixed.
Never mind my previous comment, as it’s now fixed, thanks!
Of course, Civilization V does better with Ivy Bridge than with Bloomfield, all clocked the same. At 4.8GHz (IB), CivV is like 30% faster than Nehalem (Bloomfield) at 4.2GHz.
BUT what amazes me is that Nehalem still seems to be doing just as well as IB overall, clock-for-clock. In Crysis 2, Nehalem is like 15% faster than IB. At 4.2GHz, Nehalem still beats IB at 4.8 GHz in DX11 mode, by around 15%!! I was thinking of blaming it on the system memory bandwidth (with Nehalem using triple channel), but even at only 1200MHz, Nehalem still shines pretty much just as much as it does at 2000 MHz.
The case reverses in the favor of IB but only by a few percentage points for Crysis 1, LP2, HAWX2.
It goes to show that unless one is a serious Civilization V gamer, an overclocked Nehalem would be just fine for even a GTX 690. I would guess that Starcraft 2 and Skyrim (other CPU-limited games not tested here) are the only other games that show a noticeable improvement on the Ivy Bridge.
Thanks, apoppin for all of this benchmarking that pretty much nobody else on the ‘net have done with all of these games, on the still mighty Nehalem!!
Amazing work!
It would be one of these, but with an Athlon II X4 OC with maximum range and I7 3770K OC max.
Athlon X4 ~ 3.5Ghz vs 5Ghz i7 3770K for example
It would be interesting to see one of these with a single GPU both as a dual system which is where I think you will notice more.
Sorry for my English.
I have a 3770k and a I7 920. Its was a nice review because many people with older i7s are itching for an upgrade. I do think this review is biased in its language. The non scientific language of “Way Faster” vs saying its 8 percent faster is a dead give away. “What faster is subjective where a percentage is objective. Way faster to them seems to be any test that the Ivy beats the bloomfield in.
USB 3.0 ports are nice but can be installed in an older X58 board (they fail to mention)
For gaming its not worth the upgrade at all. For most windows tasks its not worth it.
For tasks that take hours then it might be worth it. Ie encoding, but here a 6 core would be better than a quad. So an upgrade to a 6 core might be cheaper on x58 than doing entire MB/RAM swap.
Not trying to rain on the parade but this review seems to want to justify the upgrade by using subjective wording rather than just stating the percentages.