TwitterFacebookYouTubeRSS
formats

Exploring “Frame time” measurement – Part 3 – the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition



World in Conflict Soviet Assault

wic thumb Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

World In Conflict is set in an alternate history Earth where the Cold War did not end and Russia invaded the USA in 1989 and the remaining Americans decided to strike back. World in Conflict (WiC) is a real-time tactical/strategy video game developed by Massive Entertainment and released in 2007. The expansion, Soviet Assault, was released in 2009. Although it is generally considered a real-time strategy (RTS) game, World in Conflict includes gameplay typical of real-time tactical (RTT) games. WiC is filled with real vehicles from both the Russian and the American military. There are also tactical aids, including calling in massive bombing raids, access to chemical warfare, nuclear weapons, and far more.

Here is yet another amazing and very customizable and detailed DX10 benchmark that is available in-game or as a stand-alone. We use the full retail game’s in-game benchmark as it offers more settings than the demo and is fully updated by patches. The particle effects and explosions in World in Conflict Soviet Assault are truly spectacular! Every setting is fully maxed out and our display’ refresh rate is set to 120Hz in the Nvidia and AMD control panels as well as in-game.wic Setting Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

wic Setting1 Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition wic Setting2 Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

Let’s check out the frame time chart for the GTX 680.  In raw fps, it is slightly faster than the HD 7970 GHz edition:wic 680 ft Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

Now the HD 7970 GHz edition frame time chart:

WiC 7970 ft Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

Both cards perform the runs very similarly with the Radeon registering smaller spikes on the chart.  The actual gameplay in watching the benchmark is very similar with a couple of extra spikes at the beginning and near the end of the GeForce run.

Here is the GTX 680 ranking:wic 680 RANK Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

Now the HD 7970 ranking

WiC 7970 RANK Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

  • Average time: Average time across the entire run
  • 1% time: Time it takes to draw 99% of frames
  • 0.1%: Time it takes to draw 99.9% of frames

W i C Exploring Frame time measurement   Part 3   the GTX 680 versus the HD 7970 GHz Edition

Although there is some variation, the runs and gameplay on this older DX1o game are nearly identical.  The built-in benchmark is also generally more demanding on PC resources than the game itself.

 

Last Page

Next Page

  • Haldi

    Nice Test. Next one will be in Crossfire/SLi ?

    Btw. You’re gonna redo this whole test parcour when AMD releases this new anti Microstutter driver ? http://techreport.com/news/24136/driver-software-blamed-for-radeon-frame-latency-troubles-to-be-fixed-with-updates

  • AlienBabelTech_1

    Thank-you. The next planned evaluation is a continuation of the GTX 680 vs HD 7970 GHz benching using the rest of our 30 game suite. We are also going to revisit these same tests after AMD releases new drivers.

  • ocre

    this was pretty great. I love the ranking. While there a a few extreme cases where AMD is obviously having issues, looking at older games we see that not all hope is lost. AMD obviously is capable of smoothness and we do see several cases where they do better than nvidia. These may be older titles but its a great sign that this is very fixable. The troubling issue is how bad AMD performs in some of these newer games. Its off the chart!
    Its especially dramatic when you look back at the games AMD was smoother in and look at the major ugly instances.

    This review shows that AMD is capable of producing smooth gaming. I think we will see them address this and perhaps the tables might turn in AMDs favor. Now wouldnt that be fun! I am getting ahead of myself here. We should wait to see how it all pans out first before i start dreaming, lol.

    Great work!!!

  • Pingback: The War of the WHQLs: Catalyst 13.1 vs. GeForce 310.90 – HD 7970 GHz vs GTX 680 revisited | AlienBabelTech